Skip to content Skip to footer

PROPOSAL 4
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS DISCLOSURE

John Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, California 90278, owner of more than $2,000 worth of shares of the Company’s Common Stock, has notified the Company that he intends to present a proposal for consideration at the Annual Meeting. As required by the Exchange Act, the text of the stockholder proposal and supporting statement appear as submitted to the Company by the proponent. The Board and the Company accept no responsibility for the contents of the proposal or the supporting statement.

PROPOSAL 4 POLITICAL SPENDING DISCLOSURE

Resolved, Shareholders request that the Company provide a report, updated semiannually, disclosing the Company’s:

  1. Policies and procedures for making, with corporate funds or assets, contributions and expenditures (direct or indirect) to (a) participate or intervene in any campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office, or (b) influence the general public, or any segment thereof, with respect to an election or referendum.

  2. Monetary and non-monetary contributions and expenditures (direct and indirect) used in the manner described in section 1 above, including:

    1. The identity of the recipient as well as the amount paid to each; and

    2.  The title(s) of the person(s) in the Company responsible for decision-making.

The report shall be presented to the board of directors or relevant board committee and posted on the Company’s website within 12 months from the date of the annual meeting. This proposal does not encompass lobbying spending.

Supporting Statement

As long-term shareholders of Western Union, I support transparency and accountability in corporate electoral spending. This includes any activity considered intervention in a political campaign under the Internal Revenue Code, such as direct and indirect contributions to political candidates, parties, or organizations, and independent expenditures or electioneering communications on behalf of federal, state or local candidates.

Disclosure is in the best interest of the company and its shareholders. The Supreme Court recognized this in its 2010 Citizens United decision, which said, “[D]isclosure permits citizens and shareholders to react to the speech of corporate entities in a proper way. This transparency enables the electorate to make informed decisions and give proper weight to different speakers and messages.”

Publicly available records show Western Union has contributed at least $480,000 in corporate funds since the 2010 election cycle (CQMoneyLine: http://moneyline.cq.com; National Institute on Money in State Politics: http://www.followthemoney.org).

However, relying on publicly available data does not provide a complete picture of the Company’s electoral spending. For example, the Company’s payments to trade associations that may be used for election-related activities are undisclosed and unknown. This proposal asks the Company to disclose all of its electoral spending, including payments to trade associations and other taxexempt organizations, which may be used for electoral purposes. This would bring our Company in line with a growing number of leading companies, including Ameriprise Financial Inc., State Street Corp., and Intuit Inc., which present this information on their websites.

The Company’s Board and shareholders need comprehensive disclosure to fully evaluate the use of corporate assets in elections.

Please vote for this important governance reform.

Political Spending Disclosure – Proposal 4

BOARD’S STATEMENT OPPOSING THE PROPOSAL

After careful consideration, and for the following reasons, the Board believes that the proposal is not in the best interests of the Company or its stockholders, and the Board recommends voting “AGAINST” this proposal.

The Company has historically made an extremely limited number of political contributions, where such contributions are permitted by law. The Company’s political contributions are not financially material to the Company. In 2019 the Company made political contributions totaling $7,600, in 2018 the Company did not make any such contributions, and in 2017 these contributions totaled approximately $2,500. In 2019, the Company’s total expenses relating to political contributions were de minimis when compared to the Company’s total operating costs of approximately $4.4 billion.

The Company is both transparent and accountable regarding its political contributions. On a limited basis, we have pursued and will continue to pursue efforts to help inform public policy decisions that have the potential to affect our customers, employees, and the communities in which we operate. To the extent this is done through a small number of corporate political contributions, such contributions are already strictly controlled. Consider our current standards, policies and practices regarding corporate political contributions:

  • The Company maintains a formal policy regarding political activities, political contributions, and lobbying activities, which is contained in the Company’s Code of Conduct and which is publicly available in the “Corporate Governance” section of our Investor Relations website.

  • Our policy contains standards for participating in the political process for both the Company and its employees.

  • With respect to political contributions, the Company’s Code of Conduct provides that the permission of the Company’s Chief Legal Officer’s office is needed before any political contributions are made on behalf of the Company.

  • The Company’s Code of Conduct also provides that a senior executive officer of the Company’s Government Relations department and the Chief Legal Officer’s office be consulted prior to contacting a government official or retaining a lobbyist.

The Company is also transparent and accountable regarding its membership in trade associations. The Company participates in various trade associations to keep abreast of business trends as well as emerging standards within our industry. We do not join trade associations to advance political purposes, and our participation as a trade association member comes with the understanding that we may not always agree with all of the positions of the organizations or other members; we believe that the associations we belong to take many positions and address many issues in a meaningful and influential manner and in a way that will be to the Company’s benefit. Disclosure of the amounts we pay in the form of membership dues to trade associations would not provide our stockholders with a greater understanding of our business strategies, initiatives or values. Consider the following:

  • Although we must pay regular membership dues, we do not normally make additional non-dues contributions to support a group’s targeted political contributions.

  • We closely monitor the appropriateness and effectiveness of the political activities undertaken by the most significant trade associations of which we are a member.

  • Disclosure of political contributions made indirectly through trade associations could place the Company at a competitive disadvantage by revealing its strategies and priorities.

  • Requiring such disclosure may risk misrepresenting our political activities, as trade associations operate on an independent basis, and we do not agree with all positions taken by trade associations on issues.

Significant disclosure regarding the Company’s political activities and related policies is already publicly available. Consider the following:

  • Under federal law, all contributions by the Western Union Political Action Committee, the sole political action committee affiliated with the Company, are required to be reported, and a list of such contributions is publicly available at the website of the United States Federal Election Commission.

  • Contributions made directly by the Company are most frequently made to state-level candidates and representatives who are required by state law to disclose  such contributions.

  • Federal law prohibits corporations from contributing corporate treasury funds to federal candidates or federal campaign committees. Accordingly, we make none.

Given all of the above, we believe that this proposal is unnecessary, costly and largely duplicative of current reporting systems and accountability measures. We believe that participating in the political process in a transparent manner is key to good governance and an important way to enhance stockholder value and promote healthy corporate citizenship. We do not believe, however, that implementing a semiannual report on our political activity would increase stockholder value or provide stockholders with any more meaningful information than is already available. If adopted, the proposal would apply only to Western Union and to no other company and would cause Western Union to incur undue costs and administrative burdens without commensurate benefit to our stockholders.

Required Vote; Recommendation Only

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of shares of the Company’s Common Stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the subject matter is required to approve this Proposal 4. Stockholders should be aware that this stockholder proposal is simply a request that the Board take the action stated in the proposal. Approval of this proposal may not result in the requested action being taken by the Board, and therefore, its approval would not effectuate the actions requested by the proposal. Stockholders attending the Annual Meeting via webcast are deemed to be present “in person”.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE AGAINST PROPOSAL 4.

Return to top